Thomas Aquinas
(c. 1225 - 1274)
|
|
SynopsisTHOMAS OF AQUINO (or Aquinas), the profoundest and keenest defender of the doctrines of the Roman-Catholic Church; was b. in 1225 or 1227, in the castle of Rocca Sicca, near Aquino, a city not far from Naples; d. March 6, 1274, in the Cistercian convent of Fossa Nuova, near Terracina. I. Life. - Thomas, who was of noble birth, was placed in his fifth year under the monks of Monte Casino. In his tenth year he went to Naples; and in his sixteenth year, in spite of the opposition of his family, which was finally overcome by the intervention of Pope Innocent IV., he entered the Dominican order. In 1245 he was sent to Cologne to enjoy the instruction of Albertus Magnus, who directed his attention to Aristotle’s philosophy and the writings of Dionysius the Areopagite. In 1248 he was made baccalaureate of theology in Paris, and the same year began to lecture on the Sentences of Peter Lombard, at Cologne. Returning to Paris, he taught there a large throng of students. Urban IV. repeatedly offered him high ecclesiastical preferment, which he in his humility declined. Under the pontificate of Clement IV. and till 1268, he taught in Rome, Bologna, and Paris. In 1272, in obedience to his order and the wish of King Charles, he made Naples the seat of his activity. The last years of his life were principally occupied with the completion of his great work, Summa theologicæ. He died on his way to the church council at Lyons. In 1323 he was canonized by John XXII. If any one is entitled to this dignity by his life and works, Aquinas was. His piety, though monkish, was unfeigned; and he prepared himself for his writings, lectures, etc., by prayer. Louis IX. several times consulted him on matters of state. his industry, as his writings show, was intense. [Aquinas was declared a doctor of the church by Pius V. in 1567, and has a place with Augustine, Jerome, and Ambrose, among the most authoritative teachers of the church. Leo XIII., in an encyclical dated Aug. 4, 1879, recommended his works to the Catholic seminaries and theological faculties throughout the world, as a proper foundation of their religious and philosophical teaching, and particularly emphasized his political doctrines as conservative for society. The special title of this great theologian is the "Angelic Doctor," Doctor Angelicus.] II. Theology. - In certain respects, Thomas of Aquino marks the culminating point of scholasticism. He sought to establish for the science of theology a position of superior dignity and importance over the science of philosophy, and, on the other hand, the harmony of the two sciences, by distinguishing in revelation the religious truths which can be excogitated by the use of reason from those which are only known by revelation. The doctrinal creed of the church, Thomas treats as absolute truth; but it is a remarkable fact, that he uses the arguments of the church-teachers only as of probable authority (Summa theol., i. qu. 1, art. 8). He refers more frequently to biblical texts than the other scholastics; but this practice does not purify his theology, but helps to confirm the church-doctrines. his exegetical principles were good; and he expressly commended the literal interpretation of the Scriptures, omnes sensus scripturæ fundantur super unum sensum literalem ex quo solo potest trahi argumentum, etc. (Summa, 1. qu. 1, art. 10), but could not free himself from ecclesiastical authority. Thomas did not grant the ontological argument of Anselm for the existence of God. He gives several forms of the cosmological and teleological arguments, but says, that, while reason can prove that God exists, it cannot discover what his nature is. His fundamental conception of God is that of spiritual and active being. God is intelligence and will (intellectus et voluntas), the first cause. Thinking and willing are inseparable from his being. He is consequently forever returning to the idea of the absolute identity and simplicity of God. He employs all his speculative talent to explain the doctrine of the Trinity; and yet he declares that it is beyond the sphere of reason to discover the distinction of persons in the Godhead, and affirms that he who tries to prove the doctrine of the Trinity by the unaided reason derogates from faith: qui probare nilitur Trinitatem personarum naturali ratione, fidei derogat (Summa, i. qu. 32, art. 1). Although Thomas did not, like his teacher Albertus Magnus, regard the world as an emanation from God, he refers its origin to God's active will, which is nothing more than his active intelligence, which, in turn, is only the essence of God working as the first cause. He is again and again forced to regard the world as a necessary product of the Divine Being, and inclines to the thesis of its eternal existence; so that he contents himself with saying, "It is credible that the world had a beginning, but neither demonstrable nor knowable: mundum incepisse credibile est, sed non demonstrabile et scibile (Summa, i. qu. 46, art. 2). The doctrines of election and reprobation he considers in connection with the doctrine of providence. Every thing occurs under the Divine Providence, and serves a single and final end. Both reprobation and election are matters of divine decree; and the exact number of the reprobate, as well as of the elect, is determined in advance. Reprobation, however, consists not in a positive action on God’s part, but in a letting-alone. God is not the cause of sin. He simply withholds his grace, and man falls by his own will. In opposition to the Arabic philosophers, Thomas insists upon the efficiency of second causes (Summa, i. qu. 105, art. 5), through which God works. He lays emphasis on the ability of the will to choose between two tendencies in the interest of the doctrines of guilt and merit. Passing over to the creatures of God, Thomas dwells at length upon the subject of the angels, which he discusses with minute care and speculative skill. He teaches, with Augustine, that the original righteousness of Adam was a superadded gift. He spent special pains upon the elaboration of the doctrine of Christ’s person and work. He affirms the meeting in Christ of the two absolutely opposite principles of human ignorance and imperfection, and divine omniscience and perfection. He departs in some details from the Anselmic doetrine of Christ’s work, as when he denies the absolute necessity of the incarnation, and affirms that God might have redeemed man in some other way than by his Son. A human judge cannot release from punishment without expiation of guilt; but God, as the Supreme Being, can forgive without expiation, if he so chooses (Summa, iii. qu. 46, arts. 1, 2). The satisfaction of Christ removes all orignal guilt; and, by the application of his merit, the sinner secures freedom from and forgiveness of sin. Man’s nature is corrupt, and grace alone enables him to reach eternal life. Thomas passes directly from the consideration of the work of Christ to the sacraments. The number of the sacraments had already been fixed at seven, but his treatment had a shaping influence upon the discussion of the subject in after-time. He proved the necessity of seven sacraments, and the immanence in them of a supernatural element of grace. His treatment of the Eucharist, penance, and ordination, is characteristic. He held to the change of the elements to the body and blood of Christ, justified the withholding of the cup from the laity with casuistical arguments, and spoke of the sacrifice of the mass, now as a "symbolical picture of the passion" (image representativa passionis), now as a real sacrifice. It is noticeable, that, in his doctrine of the mass, he does not emphasize, as do his successors, the idea of sacrifice to the detriment of the sacramental idea. The subject of indulgences, Thomas handled at length; teaching that the efficacy of an indulgence does not depend upon the faith of the recipient, but upon the will and authority of the church, and extends to the dead as well as to the living (Summa, iii. qu. 71, art. 10). The discussion of eschatology follows the discussion of the sacraments. Thomas teaches the doctrines of purgatory and the intercession of saints, he treats the doctrines of the resurrection and future. blessedness at length, and teaches that the body of the resurrection will in form be identical with the present body, even to the hair and the nails. Thomas was not less great as a teacher of ethics than as a theologian. Neander has said, that, next to that of Aristotle, his is the most important name in the history of ethics (Wissensch. Abhandlungen, ed. Jacobi, p. 46). But both as a moralist and a theologian he was a true son of the church. His system is, as Baur says, only an echo of the doctrinal teaching of the church. In the spirit of the day he discussed many idle and useless questions with casuistical minuteness and far.fetched argumentation. But he was in this respect more moderate than his coritemporaries. On the other hand, he discussed many important subjects with a depth and clearness of insight which make his views permanently interesting and valuable. After the death of Aquinas, a conflict went on over his theology; Duns Scotus being the leader of the other school. The Dominicans were ranged on the side of Aquinas, whose followers were called Thomists; and the Franciscans on the side of Duns Scotus, whose followers were known as Scotists. The difference between the teachers was not in the doctrines they taught, but in their treatment of these doctrines. With Scotus, theology was a practical science; with Aquinas, a speculative science. The controversy lasted down to the eighteenth century; and the Franciscan De Rada mentions in his work, Controversiæ inter Thomam et Scotum (Cologne, 1620), no less than eighty-six points of difference between the two schools. The most important points of controversy were the Cognoscibility of God, the distinction between the divine attributes, original sin, the merits of Christ, etc. On the subject of the immaculate conception of the Virgin Mary, the two teachers held divergent views; Thomas denying it, Scotus asserting it. The Jesuits opposed Thomisin, as Bellarmin’s example proves; but it prevailed at the Spanish universities of Salainanca, Coimbra, and Alcala. The Roman-Catholic Church cannot forget the most profound and penetrating defender of its doctrines until it reiiounces them; and the Protestant Church will not fail to share in the admiration of Thomas Aquinas so long as it continues to admire literary greatness. Landerer, "Thomas of Aquino," Philip Schaff, ed., A Religious Encyclopaedia or Dictionary of Biblical, Historical, Doctrinal, and Practical Theology, 3rd edn, Vol. 4. Toronto, New York & London: Funk & Wagnalls Company, 1894. pp.2353-2355.
Bibliographies
Primary Sources
Secondary Sources
|
Robert Anderson & Johannes Moser, eds.
The Aquinas Prayer Book: The Prayers and Hymns of St. Thomas Aquinas.
Sophia Institute Press, 2000. Pbk. ISBN: 1928832148. pp.128.
Vernon Bourke, ed. The Pocket Aquinas. Pocket
Books, 1994. Pbk. ISBN: 0671739913. pp.10.
Mary T. Clark, ed., An
Aquinas Reader. Fordham University Press, 1988. Pbk. ISBN: 0823212068.
pp.597.
Paul Sigmund, St Thomas
Aquinas on Politics and Ethics. W.W. Norton, 1988. Pbk. ISBN: 0393952436.
pp.278.
Anton Charles Pegis, Basic Writings of Saint Thomas
Aquinas, new edn., Vol. 1. Hackett Publishing Co., Inc., 1997. Pbk. ISBN:
0872203808. pp.1151.
Anton Charles Pegis, Basic Writings of Saint Thomas
Aquinas, new edn., Vol. 2. Hackett Publishing Co., Inc., 1997. Pbk. ISBN:
0872203824. pp.1211.
Thomas Aquinas, Exposition of the "On the
Hebdomads" of Boethius, Janice L. Schultz & Edward A. Synan,
introduction & translators. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America
Press, 2001. Pbk. ISBN: 0813209951. pp.132.
Thomas Aquinas, The Literal Exposition on Job,
Anthony Damico, translator. New York: Oxford University Press, 1989. Pbk. ISBN:
1555402925. pp.504.
Thomas Aquinas, On Law, Morality, and Politics.
Hackett Publishing Co., Inc., 1995. Pbk. ISBN: 0872200310. pp.316.
Thomas Aquinas, Aquinas: Political
Writings, Robert Dyson ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002.
Hbk. ISBN: 052137569X. pp.359.
Thomas Aquinas, Selected
Writings, Ralph McInerny, ed. Harmondsworth: Penguin Books, 1998. ISBN:
0140436324. pp.880.
Thomas Aquinas, Selected Philosophical Writings,
new edn. Oxford: Oxford Paperbacks, 1998. Pbk. ISBN: 0192835858. pp.488.
Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra
Gentiles Book 1: God, new edn. University of Notre Dame Press, 1975. Pbk.
ISBN: 026801678X. pp.317.
Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles Book 2:
Providence, new edn. University of Notre Dame Press, 1991. Pbk. ISBN:
0268016887. pp.282.
Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles Book 3, Part 1:
Providence:, new edn. University of Notre Dame Press. Pbk. ISBN:
0268016860. pp.278.
Thomas Aquinas, Summa Contra Gentiles Book 4:
Salvation, new edn. University of Notre Dame Press, 1989. Pbk. ISBN:
0268016844. pp.360.
Thomas Aquinas, Summa Theologiae: A
Concise Translation, Timothy McDermott, ed. Christian Classics, 1989. Hbk.
ISBN: 0870612115. pp.652.
Thomas Aquinas, Treatise on Happiness. University
of Notre Dame Press, 1983. Pbk. ISBN: 0268018499. pp.224.
Robert Barron, Thomas Aquinas: Spiritual
Master (Crossroad Spiritual Legacy). Crossroad Publishing Company, 1996.
Pbk. ISBN: 0824525078. pp.178.
F.C. Copleston, Aquinas. Harmondsworth: Penguin
Books, 1955. Pbk. ISBN: 0140136746. pp.272.
Étienne H. Gilson, The Christian Philosophy of
St. Thomas Aquinas, new edn., L.K. Shook, translator. University of Notre
Dame Press, 1994. Pbk. ISBN: 0268008019. pp.502.
Nicholas M. Healy, Thomas Aquinas:
Theologian of the Christian Life. The Great Theologians Series. Aldershot:
Ashgate, 2003. Pbk.ISBN: 0754614727. pp.152.
John of St. Thomas, Introduction to the
Summa Theologiae of Thomas Aquinas, Ralph McInerny, translator. St
Augustine's Press, 2001. Hbk. ISBN: 1890318701. pp.224.
Norman Kretzmann & Eleanor
Stump, eds. The Cambridge Companion to Aquinas. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press, 1993. Pbk. ISBN: 0521437695. pp.312.
Ralph McInerny, Marie George, John Haas &
Russell Hittinger, The Ever-Illuminating Wisdom of St. Thomas Aquinas:
Papers Presented at a Conference Sponsored by the Wethersfield Institute New
York City, October 1. Ignatius Press, 1999. Pbk. ISBN: 0898707498.
pp.150.
Thomas F. O'Meara, Thomas
Aquinas Theologian. University of Notre Dame Press, 1997. Pbk. ISBN:
0268042012. pp.368.
Josef Pieper, Guide to
Thomas Aquinas. Ignatius Press, 1981. Pbk. ISBN: 0898703190. pp.181.
Josef Pieper, The Silence of
St. Thomas: Three Essays, John Murray & Daniel O'Connor, translator.
St. Augustine's Press, 1999. Pbk. ISBN: 1890318787. pp.128.
Timothy M. Renick, Aquinas
for Armchair Theologians. Westminster John Knox Press, 2002. Pbk. ISBN:
0664223044. pp.176.
Timothy L. Smith, ed. Aquinas's Sources:
The Notre Dame Symposium. St. Augustine's Press, 2002. Pbk. ISBN:
1587310279. pp.480.
Eleonore Stump, Aquinas. Arguments of the
Philosophers Series. London: Routledge, an imprint of Taylor & Francis
Books Ltd., 2003. Hbk. ISBN: 0415029600. pp.560.
Thomas G. Weinandy, ed., Aquinas on Doctrine.
Edinburgh: Continuum International Publishing Group - T & T Clark Ltd.,
2004. Pbk. ISBN: 0567084116. pp.296.
John F. Wippel, The Metaphysical Thought
of Thomas Aquinas. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press,
2000. Pbk. ISBN: 0813209838. pp.704.
Related Subjects
Peter Abelard | Aelfric | Alcuin | Anselm | Augustine of Canterbury | Thomas Becket | Bede | Benedict | Bernard of Clairvaux | Boniface | Thomas Bradwardine | Bruno | Catherine of Siena | Charlemagne | Charles Martel | Clare | Clovis | Columba | Dominic | Duns Scotus | Dunstan | Meister Eckhart | Desiderius Erasmus | Francis of Assisi | Gottschalk | Gregory I | Gregory of Rimini | Gregory of Tours | Hildegard of Bingen | Hugh of St. Victor | John Huss | Ignatius Loyola | Innocent III | Isidore | Jerome of Prague | Joachim of Fiore | John of Wesel | Julian of Norwich | Marjory Kempe | Ramon Llull | Nicholas of Cusa | Nicholas of Lyre | Patrick | Pepin | Peter Damian | Peter Lombard | Peter the Venerable | Photius | Richard Rolle | Scholastica | Thomas Aquinas | Wilfred | William of Ockham | William of St-Thierry | John WycliffeABOUT | SITE MAP | SUPPORT | INTRODUCTIONS | COUNCILS | CRUSADES | DOCTRINE & PRACTICE | EXPANSION | HERESIES | OTHER FAITHS | PAPACY | PEOPLE | RELIGIOUS ORDERS | BOOKS | STUDY AIDS | GUESTBOOK | CONTACT |
|
